Prosecutors Rest Case in Diddy’s Sex-Trafficking Trial as Defense Pushes for Acquittal

Prosecutors officially rested their case in the federal sex-trafficking and racketeering trial against Sean “Diddy” Combs on Tuesday. The six-week trial saw testimony from over 30 witnesses, including ex-girlfriends, former employees, and investigators.

Prosecutors alleged that Diddy ran a criminal enterprise through his business operations, notably Combs Global, orchestrating drug-fueled sexual encounters with male escorts under coercive circumstances. The jury was shown explicit video footage during the final week of testimony to bolster the government’s claims.

Defense Seeks Acquittal, Argues Weak Evidence as Diddy Declines to Testify in Trial

Immediately after the prosecution rested, Diddy’s legal team moved for a judgment of acquittal. Lead attorney Alexandra Shapiro argued that the government failed to provide substantial evidence linking Diddy directly to racketeering or sex trafficking.

She claimed that his employees were unaware of any criminal activity beyond setting up rooms and observing the use of baby oil, alcohol, and drugs. Shapiro emphasized the lack of intent or awareness among staff, stating the prosecution relied on speculation rather than solid proof.

During proceedings, Diddy addressed the judge and confirmed his decision not to testify, stating he had thoroughly discussed the matter with his lawyers and that it was solely his choice. Legal experts described the move as a calculated risk, possibly to avoid further damaging revelations under cross-examination. His demeanor in court was calm, even complimenting the judge’s conduct of the trial, a moment that drew media attention given the serious nature of the charges.

Accusers Detail Coercion, Drugs, and Abuse as Defense Targets: Testimony Credibility in Court

Key testimonies from ex-girlfriends Cassie Ventura and another woman testifying under a pseudonym, Jane, alleged that Diddy forced them into drug-laced group sex acts. They described disturbing incidents labeled as “freak offs” or “hotel nights,” often involving male escorts, with drugs like MDMA and cocaine reportedly provided by Diddy’s aides.

The women testified that they were manipulated or coerced into participating, and that Diddy continues to support them financially, raising concerns about witness influence.

The defense declined to call any witnesses, instead planning to introduce evidence to challenge the consistency of prosecution testimonies. Shapiro contended the government failed to meet the legal standards required for racketeering charges, such as offering bribes or acting with corrupt intent.

She also argued that the witnesses had autonomy and could have left if they felt threatened, using Mia’s continued employment as an example. Closing arguments are scheduled to begin on Thursday, following the finalization of jury instructions on Wednesday.