Live Nation Faces Antitrust Trial Over Alleged Monopolistic Practices in Live Events Industry

The upcoming jury trial, tentatively scheduled for March 2026, marks a pivotal moment in the legal battle between the US Department of Justice and Live Nation Entertainment. At the heart of the dispute is the accusation that Live Nation, leveraging its dominant position in the live events industry, has engaged in anticompetitive practices to stifle competition and exploit consumers.

The government, joined by numerous states, aims to reverse the merger between Live Nation and Ticketmaster, alleging it has led to higher fees for fans, limited opportunities for artists, and diminished choices for venues and promoters.

The lawsuit details several alleged strategies employed by Live Nation to maintain its monopolistic grip. Among these claims is Live Nation’s purported collusion with Oak View Group to avoid competing for artist talent and steer venues into exclusive agreements with Ticketmaster.

Additionally, the Department of Justice asserts that Live Nation obstructed international promoter TEG’s US expansion efforts and exerted pressure on venues and artists to use its services under threat of business repercussions.

In response, Live Nation has denied the allegations and sought to relocate the trial from the Southern District of New York to Washington, DC, citing the jurisdiction established by a previous consent decree in 2010.

Judge Arun Subramanian, while inclined to retain jurisdiction, has allowed for arguments on the venue’s suitability, with motions expected by mid-July 2025. Discovery in the case is slated to begin shortly thereafter and conclude by October 2025, underscoring the intricate legal preparations underway leading up to the trial.

The outcome of this trial could have far-reaching implications for the live events industry, influencing competition dynamics and consumer choices nationwide. As both sides prepare their arguments and evidence over the coming months, the case against Live Nation stands as a significant test of antitrust laws and regulatory oversight in a critical sector of the entertainment economy.